You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Hello to you,
I have the impression that people want to be governed and that they are quite prepared to accept a government that uses its power to suppress and, if necessary, imprison those among its own people or make life difficult for them who speak out against the government's course. The thin varnish of democracy does not conceal the fact that, in an emergency, people will place themselves under the protectorate of those who they think will benefit them because they have the stronger means.
In 2020, it became very clear how quickly and uncritically people were prepared to sacrifice their brothers and sisters, their work colleagues, and most quickly the very old and the very young, who are always the least able to assert themselves.
The speed with which people allowed themselves to be frightened also matched the speed with which they saw themselves as enemies on a horizontal level. A people that does not recognise when it is divided is one to which one can already ascribe the anarchistic traits that mirror those of those who 'govern' it.
Who did not immediately become a sceptic when, in April or May, Mr Gates was given a full seven minutes of prime time airtime on German national television, where he said that he intended to âvaccinate seven billion peopleâ and was not asked a single critical question by the moderator, does not have good instincts.
Contrary to the lunatic minds amongst us humans, I am for having a functioning government. Who executes crimes and punishes criminals.
But since the things stand on their heads, it nowadays can happen that a fair playing citizen is being seen as a criminal, while an unfair playing citizen is benefited or spared consequences.
The alternative media you talked about is a product of the outrage and deep anger towards that development, oftentimes very unprofessionally produced and presented. If people are emotional, they lose to stay clear in mind and calm in action.
This division between âbrother and brotherâ continues on all other topics and the more topics, the more people are divided in their highly personal relationships, i.e. between husband and wife, parents and children, work colleagues and even hostility in the supermarket or elsewhere in the public sphere. A people with good instincts, however, would not allow this to happen and the power of those hungry for power or the power of the overanxious would fizzle out.
But because it is never the case that all people agree, and because this knowledge exists in the world, you only need to apply it. So far, our Christian heritage has prevented us from returning to pre-Christian ideas and re-adopting tribal thinking. However, as more and more people become atheists and our religion loses its meaning, people are guided by the idea that revenge should become a right. And where this is thought to be the case, targets are needed on which to exact retribution.
The exceptions to the principles of the rule of law, which in turn are based on Christian order, have been declared to be new ârightsâ.
Now, these people forget that they themselves can be seen as targets one day, since many of them are privileged people indeed, and their presence in the media might be understood as an invitation to not only make their life difficult but to kill them. Since not everyone in the world comes from a Christian background.
It is possible to have as objective a view of events as possible. While that does not mean to always be absolutely right. But there is a space between zero and one hundred.
I recommend reading this article: https://multipolar-magazin.de/artikel/die-niederlage-des-westens
Greetings to you and God bless you.
it seems to come down to faith in things higher or more fundamental than human laws. that is why even as a non-christian i can deeply relate to people who live for god, rather than for the nihilistic icons and wordly ideologies of "the (fictional) world"
they generally seem to have retained more of their human-ness or their 'instincts' as you put it. they do not pathologically reference current ideology to justify their actions, rather they reference their religious ideology and the words of jesus which is in many senses more aware of human abuse of power than the average atheist.
an objective view depends entirely on our frame of reference, which is why the smartest people can be absolutely lost in the sound logic of a mind construct whose foundation is erroneous.
god as a foundation makes people accept that not everything in the world is as it may seem or that we have all the answers yet. it's just that christianity may not be the roots of our culture but rather the first major attack on the roots of our culture because it assumes and presupposes certain ideas that may already lead one down a potentially unfactual path, for instance the idea that god is transcendant rather than omnipresent in all of life, that i am here and god is somewhere else. it spawns the idea of causality, of separation between a this and a that which does have apparent merit talking about the physical world, but falls short on realizing the interconnectedness of all things or the very sober realization that "things" do not exist any more than our obsessive need to divide and sort everything into little bits for the social convenience of being able to talk about them.
i like recommendations, will read that article after a shower. it's very good to read you again, many blessings to you
View more