You are viewing a single comment's thread:
RE: Dutch Court Orders Bill Gates to Appear in Person to Defend against Charges of Crimes Against Humanity
i feel most alternative media has become an amplifier of the worst case imaginable. in that sense they do the gang's job of fear-mongering way more effectively than the legacy media who have lost credibility even in the eyes of the masses. people in alternative media generally believe fully in what they are publicizing and it comes across as genuine to people. it might be one of the main reasons the gang has "given" the internet to people. many learned a lot, but so many narratives can be more effectively controlled through authentic and genuine pundits who are unaware of their role in the publicizing of false, system-entrenching ideas.
there is good reason to reject the entirety of "alternative" views on covid for instance because those stances fully ignore the scientific basis of the claim, much like the official narrative does. namely that there are such things as pathogens or even human cells. i am not certain any longer and will not take it for granted.
the pattern should be familiar now: make an official claim and limit the borders of discussion with the equally false "truther" narrative to encompass a planned playing field of discourse. i always raise an eyebrow when i find the commonality of both allegedly opposite views, and thus find the real agenda, i.e. which core concept (faith) is to be fortified in the public mind.
by that we can also find the more likely answers, though to be fair i get the feeling that even those are merely damage control views on the gang's part for those smart enough the to see through both lies. not sure it is possible to discern the objective truth through linear mind logic alone these days.
the truth has been fenced off carefully to an incredibly impressive degree.
and, i agree: community will trump everything. experience counts above all else. keeping an open mind and exchanging energy, thoughts and helpful deeds with those resonant to our own path in life seems indeed the best way forward. sharing is caring, and there will be a whole lot of that one way or another.
blessings dude!
I pretty strongly agree. We really need experiential evidence to support conjecture if we expect any kind of understanding of the real world. However, given our human existence we have to have an idea of what the world we live in is, how it operates, and what we should do to secure our existence. Whether we are primitive hunters whose horizon delimits our world, whose culture founds our conceptions of the world, and without experience of other possibilities than those and what our examinations of what our hands can hold before our eyes reveals, or urban consumers of Tik Tok and the practically illimitable streams of narrative competing for our attention, we have an idea of the world we live in, a gestalt we try to pigeonhole everything into. If we are faced with some novelty that doesn't fit we can try to extend our gestalt, ignore the new evidence, or reconceive of that evidence to comply with our worldview.
How we approach such information determines who we are, and in the end, because we all expire, all our hopes and dreams, our understanding or ignorance, fade away and become irrelevant to the world we are actually in. I find it useful to keep that irrelevance in mind, seeking to keep my expectations within reasonable limits, because little disturbs my peace more than the crushing of my hope, which invariably results from taking myself too seriously or expecting too much of me or my world and having to settle for whatever actually does come to pass.
I also concur that we too often simply accept sincerity as revealing what is factual, but I know about me that what I believe often has no concordance with facts, which is why I'm a confirmed bachelor today, amongst other things. We are also pretty gullible and folks that strive to be forthright expect others are also. That is why marriages so often last, and why it took so long for the corporate media to lose the confidence of anyone with any capacity to reason. Some people may well believe in reptilians or the flat Earth, and this can get people to believe in those things because they believe sincere reporters, but, sadly, sincerity isn't necessarily related to factual reality. We are so incompetent that the vast majority of reality is neither perceivable nor conceivable to us, and most of us are overconfident in our worldview, so sincerely report things to be what we cannot know and are almost certainly wrong about.
Thanks!
mmhhhmmm, those were some great reminders man. i think i have been taking myself and life too seriously lately again, i keep falling into that. so my gratitude for pointing that helpful strategy out in yourself.
well, we do have to start somewhere and i feel reminding each other of our particular unchecked beliefs is a token of friendship between individuals if it comes from a eye-level energy, which is where most truthers fail. i have failed at it many times until i found the catch in my newfound "truth" and felt like a dumbass ;)
as long as we leave the possibility of being wrong open i think we're "safe". i for one will no longer vouch for the earth having curvature. or the moon being a reflector of the sun's light. or the earth existing in an infinite vacuum.
nor will i vouch for a an icewall in antartica or the idea that the sun and all stars travel in one giant circle around polaris.
i miss crucial evidence for both "mainstream" cosmologies at this point and both camps dislike me for it ahahaha.
other than an otherworldly experience with an "unhuman" stranger while being on psilocybin i have no reason to take the reptilian story seriously at all. but the jury is still out on everything, it's just that the case i have seen for it is weak and untestable ;)
so i keep coming back to my dated and almost boring mantra that has served me well for over a decade: nobody knows what's up on earth.
my best to you and yours
Hello to you,
I have the impression that people want to be governed and that they are quite prepared to accept a government that uses its power to suppress and, if necessary, imprison those among its own people or make life difficult for them who speak out against the government's course. The thin varnish of democracy does not conceal the fact that, in an emergency, people will place themselves under the protectorate of those who they think will benefit them because they have the stronger means.
In 2020, it became very clear how quickly and uncritically people were prepared to sacrifice their brothers and sisters, their work colleagues, and most quickly the very old and the very young, who are always the least able to assert themselves.
The speed with which people allowed themselves to be frightened also matched the speed with which they saw themselves as enemies on a horizontal level. A people that does not recognise when it is divided is one to which one can already ascribe the anarchistic traits that mirror those of those who 'govern' it.
Who did not immediately become a sceptic when, in April or May, Mr Gates was given a full seven minutes of prime time airtime on German national television, where he said that he intended to ‘vaccinate seven billion people’ and was not asked a single critical question by the moderator, does not have good instincts.
Contrary to the lunatic minds amongst us humans, I am for having a functioning government. Who executes crimes and punishes criminals.
But since the things stand on their heads, it nowadays can happen that a fair playing citizen is being seen as a criminal, while an unfair playing citizen is benefited or spared consequences.
The alternative media you talked about is a product of the outrage and deep anger towards that development, oftentimes very unprofessionally produced and presented. If people are emotional, they lose to stay clear in mind and calm in action.
This division between ‘brother and brother’ continues on all other topics and the more topics, the more people are divided in their highly personal relationships, i.e. between husband and wife, parents and children, work colleagues and even hostility in the supermarket or elsewhere in the public sphere. A people with good instincts, however, would not allow this to happen and the power of those hungry for power or the power of the overanxious would fizzle out.
But because it is never the case that all people agree, and because this knowledge exists in the world, you only need to apply it. So far, our Christian heritage has prevented us from returning to pre-Christian ideas and re-adopting tribal thinking. However, as more and more people become atheists and our religion loses its meaning, people are guided by the idea that revenge should become a right. And where this is thought to be the case, targets are needed on which to exact retribution.
The exceptions to the principles of the rule of law, which in turn are based on Christian order, have been declared to be new ‘rights’.
Now, these people forget that they themselves can be seen as targets one day, since many of them are privileged people indeed, and their presence in the media might be understood as an invitation to not only make their life difficult but to kill them. Since not everyone in the world comes from a Christian background.
It is possible to have as objective a view of events as possible. While that does not mean to always be absolutely right. But there is a space between zero and one hundred.
I recommend reading this article: https://multipolar-magazin.de/artikel/die-niederlage-des-westens
Greetings to you and God bless you.
it seems to come down to faith in things higher or more fundamental than human laws. that is why even as a non-christian i can deeply relate to people who live for god, rather than for the nihilistic icons and wordly ideologies of "the (fictional) world"
they generally seem to have retained more of their human-ness or their 'instincts' as you put it. they do not pathologically reference current ideology to justify their actions, rather they reference their religious ideology and the words of jesus which is in many senses more aware of human abuse of power than the average atheist.
an objective view depends entirely on our frame of reference, which is why the smartest people can be absolutely lost in the sound logic of a mind construct whose foundation is erroneous.
god as a foundation makes people accept that not everything in the world is as it may seem or that we have all the answers yet. it's just that christianity may not be the roots of our culture but rather the first major attack on the roots of our culture because it assumes and presupposes certain ideas that may already lead one down a potentially unfactual path, for instance the idea that god is transcendant rather than omnipresent in all of life, that i am here and god is somewhere else. it spawns the idea of causality, of separation between a this and a that which does have apparent merit talking about the physical world, but falls short on realizing the interconnectedness of all things or the very sober realization that "things" do not exist any more than our obsessive need to divide and sort everything into little bits for the social convenience of being able to talk about them.
i like recommendations, will read that article after a shower. it's very good to read you again, many blessings to you
View more