RE: Speech, Survival, and Subjugation

Your circumstances are novel to you,

Well not really, I am British, but I live in China, a far more significant police state. So I'm getting rammed from both sides for 15 years. But anyway...

From my experience, what you discuss, fighting against the NWO is a fanciful pipe dream afforded only to people in free countries like the USA.

If the people of the UK act now, it is likely that few people will die in the revolution

You make it sound again like a fiction. The UK isn't some failed state African country lol. It's a functional yet flawed democracy. In France, another functional yet flawed democracy, they protest and riot all the time, famously so. Does that mean they need to overthrow the government with untold levels of bloodshed because, what, their retirement age is going up a couple of years?

in fear from deposing the tyrannies that incrementally take possession of them

I do agree with the sentiment generally, we are tolerant to the point of our own demise. But we're also hyper-aware, as we always have been over here in Europe, of these changes to communism, to sharia law, globalism.

Right now, the number 1 issue is immigration. The leaders want to try and ignore it, but it's still being discussed constantly in mainstream and independent media. It's everywhere. We're seeing more countries in the EU reject immigration now, going right-wing and protectionist policies, changing in our favour. Because we're functional democracies. It's slow, but the only way to do it quickly is by turning into an authoritarian dictatorship or, as you say, a violent, bloody uprising.

Another problem is the threat to our freedom of speech. The solution is not overthrowing the government. It's making sure the people are heard. In the UK, we were ignored for a decade, and now we not only voted that government out, but we politically annihilated them to the point they may never be in power ever again. If the new party does the same, they will be crushed again in the next election, until we get somebody new (in this case, Reform party) who will listen. Right now, the new party is terrified after seeing what happened to their predecessors. They are walking on eggshells.

This is how it should be.

The law about suppressing speech freedom has changed multiple times to try and balance freedom with offence. It's definitely not in the right place, but it will go through further amendments. Democracy.

It's an irresponsible game to glorify such a high risk move, especially when the narrative is almost always far, far more complex than simply 'tyrannical leader bad, underdogs good', as much as some people really want it to be.